home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
051192
/
05119938.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
81 lines
<text id=92TT1055>
<title>
May 11, 1992: Reviews:Books
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
May 11, 1992 L.A.:"Can We All Get Along?"
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
REVIEWS, Page 63
BOOKS
Out of Focus
</hdr><body>
<p>By RICHARD ZOGLIN
</p>
<p> TITLE: The Age of Missing Information
AUTHOR: Bill McKibben
PUBLISHER: Random House; 261 pages; $20
</p>
<p> THE BOTTOM LINE: An original and invigorating look at what
TV tells us about the world, and what it leaves out.
</p>
<p> Here, in the parlance of Hollywood, is a high-concept
idea. Bill McKibben, a contributor to the New Yorker and author
of The End of Nature, decided to take a look at what television
tells us -- and doesn't tell us -- about the world we live in.
So he set up two representative days. For one 24-hour period, he
taped and watched every minute of programming (more than 2,000
hours' worth) on all 93 channels in the Fairfax County, Va.,
cable system. On the other day, he lolled around a pond and did
some hiking in the Adirondack Mountains. His conclusion: despite
the unceasing torrent of news, commercials, televangelists,
sitcoms and game shows, TV provides an incomplete and distorted
picture of our world -- a picture that "masks and drowns out the
subtle and vital information contact with the real world once
provided."
</p>
<p> This back-to-basics experiment seems, at first blush,
naive and obvious. Does one really need a walk in the woods to
discover that TV has too many sitcoms, or that the Home Shopping
Network is crass? Well, maybe we do. The Age of Missing
Information is an invigorating, even revelatory look at what the
TV age hath wrought.
</p>
<p> Nearly every page has something fresh to say, or a fresh
spin to put on things that have grown terminally familiar. TV,
McKibben observes, celebrates unlimited consumption and economic
expansion; a day on the mountain reminds us that the natural
world is a place of limits, of cyclical time, of death. Though
it links the world in a "global village," TV erodes the sense
of community, both by obliterating regional distinctions (all
anchormen have the same accent) and by lampooning the community
of shared values portrayed by TV in the '50s. The medium fosters
a "weirdly foreshortened" sense of history by endlessly reliving
and re-examining the past 40 years (the period, of course, in
which television has existed). The effect is to make the past
four decades seem to us "utterly normative" -- when, in fact,
they are a radical departure from any period that came before.
</p>
<p> Most important, TV diverts our attention from nature's
"one great secret": man is not the center of the universe. "The
idea of standing under the stars and feeling how small you are
-- that's not a television idea," says McKibben. "Everything on
television tells you the opposite -- that you're the most
important person, and that people are all that matter."
</p>
<p> McKibben's environmentalist agenda is never far from the
surface. Our disconnection from the real world, he argues, has
blinded us to the urgency of the ecological crises facing us,
from global warming to the wasteful use of finite resources. One
doesn't have to believe TV is all to blame for this to heed
McKibben's lessons about the omnipresent box. Like turn it off
once in a while.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>